There are several financial planning platforms available to choose from — but most tools weren’t built with small-business owners in mind. Popular platforms like Pry and Finmark were created for FP&A teams and founders preparing to raise capital at technology startups.
If you’re a small business owner outside of the startup world, your needs look very different:
- You don’t want to maintain a giant spreadsheet.
- You don’t want to build a complex financial model.
- You do want CFO-quality insights automatically generated and delivered in an easy-to-understand format — without hiring an expensive financial expert.
This is exactly why we built RunSmart — a tool purpose-built for small business owners who want clarity and confidence without the complexity, headaches, or manual inputs.
Below is a comparison of RunSmart, Pry, and Finmark across the categories that matter most.
Key Differences at a Glance
RunSmart
Designed for small business owners. Automatically analyzes your QuickBooks data, evaluates your financial health, generates rolling 1–5 year forecasts, and delivers monthly PDF reports — all without requiring a finance background.
Pry
Built for funded technology startups and FP&A teams. Strong for complex custom modeling, fundraising, and scenario planning — but requires users to build custom formulas and is difficult for the average business owner to use without formal finance training.
Finmark
Geared toward technology startups needing top-down forecasting templates. Good for pitch decks and basic planning, but lacks the depth in operational metrics and detailed insights most small business owners expect.
Comparison Table: RunSmart vs. Pry vs. Finmark
| Category | RunSmart | Pry | Finmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Audience | Small business owners in any industry (non-finance users) | FP&A teams at funded technology startups | Founders at early-stage technology startups |
| Ease of Use | Extremely simple — no modeling or manual number crunching | Complex — requires custom formulas, financial modeling expertise, and spreadsheet skills | Simple but template-limited |
| Data Source | Direct QuickBooks Online integration | QBO + other integrations | QBO + other integrations |
| Forecasting | Rolling forecasts generated automatically | Requires building a custom financial model | Template-driven projections requiring user input |
| Business Health Insights | ✔️ Built-in diagnostics & KPI health scores | ❌ Manual interpretation | ❌ Manual interpretation |
| Headcount & Payroll Planning | ✔️ Strong | ✔️ Strong | ⚠️ Basic |
| Loan Planner | ✔️ Built-in & designed for loan-readiness | ❌ Not included | ❌ Not included |
| Monthly PDF Reports | ✔️ Automated & delivered to you | ❌ Manual exports | ⚠️ Limited |
| Collaboration | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Pricing | $59–$249 (based on features) | ~$50–$600+ (based on average expenses) | ~$50–$250+ (based on annual revenue) |
Detailed Breakdown
1. Who Each Platform Was Built For
RunSmart:
Purpose-built for small business owners who need clear visibility into:
- current financial health
- hidden risks
- what’s improving vs. declining
- why changes happened
- how the future looks over the next several years
RunSmart delivers CFO-quality insights without requiring CFO-level skills.
Pry:
Mainly designed for FP&A teams and financial analysts at funded technology startups. It’s powerful, but it assumes users know how to:
- build custom formulas
- maintain interconnected models
- understand financial statement interactions
- work across multi-tab modeling structures
This makes Pry very difficult for the average small-business owner without a finance background.
Finmark:
Built for early-stage tech startups that need quick, top-down forecasts for pitch decks or early planning — not meant to produce deep insights or uncover hidden trends or risks hidden in your financial data.
2. Approach to Insights & Explainability
RunSmart uses deterministic, proven algorithms to:
- assess numerous KPIs across profitability, liquidity, solvency, capitalization and efficiency
- detect early warning signs
- explain what changed and why
- highlight areas that need attention
Pry and Finmark place interpretation entirely on the user — which works fine for finance teams who know how to decipher financial data, but not for the average business owner who simply needs clear answers.
3. Forecasting Philosophy
RunSmart:
Automatically generates rolling forecasts based on your historical data and updates them every month after syncing with QuickBooks. No manual setup, no modeling, no formulas.
Pry:
Provides deep flexibility but at the cost of complexity:
- users must construct and maintain a model
- forecasting knowledge is required
- small modeling errors can cascade throughout the plan
Finmark:
Uses simple templates to estimate the future — fine for new tech startups or exploring business ideas, but too shallow for fully operational small businesses.
4. Reporting
RunSmart sends monthly PDF reports directly to your inbox that include:
- performance trends
- KPI insights
- actual vs budget
- month-over-month changes
Pry and Finmark offer reporting, but neither provides a hands-off, automated monthly reporting package tailored to small businesses.
Which Platform Should You Choose?
Choose RunSmart if:
- You’re a small-business owner
- You don’t want to build financial models
- You want CFO-quality insights in plain English
- You want clarity, confidence, and automatic forecasts without needing a finance team
Choose Pry if:
- You’re a funded technology startup
- You have a CFO, FP&A team, or outsourced finance support
- You need custom modeling flexibility for fundraising
Choose Finmark if:
- You’re early-stage or pre-revenue
- You need top-down projections from simple inputs
- You’re building a pitch deck or validating an idea